The capture of the 900-year-old fortress came after several days of intense combat and airstrikes in the rugged terrain near the Lebanese city of Nabatiyeh. Military officials said the operation focused on securing the Beaufort Ridge and the Wadi al-Saluki area, which Israel claims Hezbollah had used to launch attacks against Israeli military positions and civilian communities in northern Israel.

The development represents Israel’s deepest ground incursion into Lebanon in more than 26 years and comes despite a ceasefire that was announced in mid-April. The truce has been repeatedly tested by continued exchanges of fire between Israeli forces and Hezbollah fighters.

Israeli officials said the operation followed one of the heaviest days of Hezbollah rocket and drone attacks on northern Israel since the ceasefire took effect, prompting school closures and emergency restrictions in several communities near the border.

Perched atop a commanding hill overlooking large portions of southern Lebanon and northern Israel, Beaufort Castle is considered a highly strategic military position. Israeli military officials argue that controlling the site provides valuable surveillance capabilities and limits Hezbollah’s ability to operate in the area.

The fortress, originally built during the Crusader era in the 12th century, has long been associated with regional conflicts due to its commanding location. It was previously occupied by Israeli forces during Israel’s presence in southern Lebanon from 1982 until 2000.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ordered military forces to continue advancing deeper into southern Lebanon, signaling that operations against Hezbollah are likely to continue despite ongoing diplomatic efforts aimed at restoring the ceasefire. New rounds of U.S.-mediated talks between Israel and Lebanon are expected to take place in Washington in the coming days.

Lebanese officials have condemned the operation, warning that the continued advance risks further destabilizing the region and undermining efforts to achieve a lasting ceasefire.

The broader conflict has resulted in thousands of casualties and the displacement of more than one million people in Lebanon since fighting escalated in March, making it one of the most serious confrontations between Israel and Hezbollah in decades.

Mexico and the European Union have formally signed a long-awaited modernized free trade agreement, updating a framework that has been in place since 2000, in a move aimed at strengthening economic ties and reducing reliance on the United States.

The agreement was concluded at a high-level summit involving Mexican leadership and top EU officials. It expands the scope of the existing trade relationship beyond goods to include services, digital trade, investment flows, and government procurement, while also easing tariff barriers on a wide range of agricultural and industrial products.

Officials from both sides framed the deal as a strategic effort to diversify trade partnerships at a time of heightened global economic uncertainty and renewed protectionist policies from Washington. The agreement is widely viewed as part of a broader shift in global trade alignment, as major economies seek to hedge against U.S. tariff policy under President Donald Trump.

Mexico, which conducts the majority of its trade with the United States, has faced ongoing pressure from tariffs affecting key exports such as automobiles, steel, and agricultural goods. The European Union has also confronted elevated duties and trade friction with Washington, prompting renewed urgency to secure alternative trade channels.

European Commission officials said the deal is expected to significantly increase bilateral trade volumes over the coming years, with projections suggesting strong export growth on both sides. Mexico anticipates a major expansion of its exports to Europe by 2030, while EU exporters are expected to benefit from improved market access in Latin America’s second-largest economy.

The agreement still requires ratification by the European Parliament before it can fully enter into force.

Economists say the pact reflects a broader global trend of “de-risking” trade exposure from dominant economic powers, particularly the United States, as geopolitical competition reshapes international commerce.

Nigeria is accelerating efforts to strengthen its maritime security capabilities by expanding local naval shipbuilding and maintenance operations in Lagos, reducing dependence on foreign-built vessels while increasing its ability to combat piracy, oil theft, and smuggling in the Gulf of Guinea.

According to reports and maritime security analyses, the Nigerian Navy has been investing heavily in indigenous shipbuilding through the government-owned Naval Dockyard Limited, where locally designed patrol boats and Seaward Defence Boats are being constructed and maintained. The initiative forms part of Nigeria’s broader push for maritime self-reliance and enhanced regional security operations.

The locally produced patrol vessels are already being deployed in operations targeting crude oil theft, piracy, illegal fishing, arms trafficking, and smuggling activities across Nigerian waters and the wider Gulf of Guinea. Nigerian naval officials say the expansion of domestic shipbuilding capacity will lower maintenance costs, reduce dependence on foreign contractors, and improve operational readiness.

Nigeria has also increased naval deployments as part of multinational maritime security operations. During Exercise Obangame Express 2026, the Nigerian Navy deployed 10 warships, helicopters, and special operations units to strengthen anti-piracy operations in one of the world’s most strategically important shipping corridors.

Recent analysis published by Al Jazeera noted that piracy incidents in the Gulf of Guinea have declined significantly in recent years, aided by stronger regional naval cooperation and increased maritime surveillance capabilities.

The expansion of Nigeria’s indigenous naval industry is increasingly viewed as a strategic national security project, especially as the country seeks to protect offshore oil infrastructure and secure commercial shipping routes that are vital to both Nigeria’s economy and regional trade.

Ismaïl Omar Guelleh has been re-elected for a sixth presidential term after official results confirmed he secured 97.81% of the vote in Friday’s election, extending his more than 25-year hold on power in Djibouti.

The outcome reinforces Guelleh’s position as one of Africa’s longest-serving leaders. Now 78, he has governed the strategically important Horn of Africa nation since 1999, overseeing its development into a key logistical and military hub, located along critical global shipping routes near the Bab el-Mandeb Strait.

Historical context of Guelleh’s rule

Guelleh’s presidency is closely tied to Djibouti’s post-independence political structure, which a single ruling coalition has dominated since the 1990s. He succeeded his uncle, Hassan Gouled Aptidon, the country’s first president, after serving as a senior security and administrative official within the government.

Over successive elections, Guelleh has maintained strong institutional control through the ruling party and allied political structures, while also benefiting from Djibouti’s geopolitical importance, which has attracted sustained foreign military and economic partnerships.

Opposition landscape in the election

This election featured limited competition, with opposition participation historically weakened by fragmentation, restrictions on political organization, and periodic boycotts. Opposition figures in recent cycles have generally struggled to mount unified campaigns capable of challenging the ruling coalition’s dominance.

In this latest vote, opposition parties again contested under constrained conditions, with critics arguing that the electoral environment offers limited space for genuine political alternation. Supporters of the government, however, maintain that the electoral process reflects national stability and continuity in leadership.

Broader implications

Guelleh’s renewed mandate underscores the persistence of entrenched incumbency in Djibouti’s political system. While the government continues to emphasize stability and development, the overwhelming margin of victory is likely to renew debate among analysts and opposition groups regarding political pluralism and electoral competitiveness in the country.

The result consolidates continuity at a time when Djibouti remains a focal point of international strategic interest and regional security dynamics in the Horn of Africa.

The United States and Iran are engaged in discussions over a potential 45-day ceasefire, as regional mediators intensify diplomatic efforts to halt escalating conflict and prevent a broader regional crisis, according to multiple reports.

The proposed arrangement, still under negotiation, would serve as an initial phase aimed at creating space for a more comprehensive and potentially permanent agreement. Officials familiar with the talks indicate that the ceasefire could be extended if progress toward a longer-term settlement is achieved.

At the center of the negotiations are two critical issues: the reopening and security of the Strait of Hormuz, and the future of Iran’s uranium stockpile. The strategic waterway, through which a significant portion of the world’s oil supply passes, has been effectively disrupted amid the ongoing conflict, raising global energy concerns and prompting urgent international attention.

Iran’s nuclear program also remains a key point of contention. U.S. officials have emphasized the importance of limiting or securing Iran’s enriched uranium, which experts say is close to weapons-grade levels, while Tehran has historically resisted external control over its nuclear assets.

Regional actors—including Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkey—are reportedly playing intermediary roles, facilitating communication between Washington and Tehran as tensions remain high. Diplomats describe the current negotiations as a “last-ditch effort” to avoid further escalation that could involve expanded strikes on infrastructure and retaliatory attacks across the Gulf.

Despite the urgency, uncertainty surrounds the likelihood of a breakthrough. Neither the White House nor Iranian officials have formally confirmed the details of the proposal, and previous diplomatic deadlines have passed without agreement.

The outcome of the talks is expected to have far-reaching implications, not only for the trajectory of the conflict but also for global energy markets and regional stability, as the Strait of Hormuz remains a critical chokepoint in international trade.

The United Nations General Assembly has overwhelmingly adopted a resolution recognizing the enslavement of Africans during the transatlantic slave trade as “the gravest crime against humanity,” marking a significant moment in ongoing global debates over historical accountability, justice, and reparations.

The measure, introduced by Ghana, passed with 123 votes in favor, while three countries—the United States, Israel, and Argentina—voted against it. Fifty-two nations, including the United Kingdom and several European Union member states, abstained.

Although resolutions of the General Assembly are not legally binding, they carry considerable symbolic and political weight as expressions of international consensus.

Call for Reparations and Historical Recognition

The resolution urges member states to formally acknowledge the transatlantic slave trade’s legacy by considering public apologies and contributing to reparations initiatives. While it does not specify financial figures, it encourages the establishment of funds to support education, skills development, and community advancement for affected populations.

Addressing the assembly ahead of the vote, Ghana’s President John Dramani Mahama emphasized the moral significance of the resolution.

“Let it be recorded that when history beckoned, we did what was right for the memory of the millions who suffered the indignity of the slave trade and those who continue to suffer racial discrimination,” he said. He added that the resolution serves as both “a safeguard against forgetting” and a challenge to the enduring consequences of slavery.

Ghana’s Foreign Minister Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa reinforced the country’s position, clarifying that the push for reparations is not about financial gain for governments but about justice for victims and their descendants. He highlighted proposals for educational endowments, training programs, and cultural restoration initiatives.

Persistent Legacy of Slavery

Between the 16th and 19th centuries, an estimated 12 to 15 million Africans were forcibly transported across the Atlantic, with over two million dying during the journey. The resolution underscores that the consequences of this system continue to manifest in structural inequalities, underdevelopment, and racial discrimination affecting people of African descent globally.

Backed by regional blocs such as the African Union and the Caribbean Community, the measure reflects growing international momentum behind what is increasingly described as “reparatory justice.” The African Union has designated reparations as a central theme for 2025, while Commonwealth leaders have also called for dialogue on the issue.

Opposition and Legal Concerns

Countries opposing or abstaining from the resolution raised concerns about its legal framing and implications. The United Kingdom acknowledged the profound harm caused by slavery but argued that the resolution’s wording presents challenges under international law. Its UN ambassador, James Kariuki, stated that no single set of historical atrocities should be elevated above others.

Similarly, the United States rejected the notion of a legal obligation to provide reparations for actions that were not prohibited under international law at the time. Its UN representative, Dan Negrea, also questioned the practical implementation of reparatory justice, including identifying eligible beneficiaries.

Cultural Restitution and Broader Impact

Beyond financial reparations, the resolution calls for the return of cultural artifacts taken during the colonial period. Ghanaian officials stressed that such items hold deep historical, cultural, and spiritual significance and should be restored to their countries of origin.

The vote highlights a widening global divide over how to address historical injustices, particularly as debates over racial equity, historical memory, and cultural restitution intensify. While not enforceable, the resolution signals a growing willingness among a majority of nations to formally confront the enduring legacy of the transatlantic slave trade.

New York, March 25, 2026 — Ghana’s President, John Dramani Mahama, has issued a pointed critique of the United States government, accusing it of fostering an environment that risks diminishing the recognition of Black history.

Speaking in New York City on Tuesday, Mahama expressed concern over what he characterized as a growing normalization of policies and narratives that sideline or erase key aspects of Black historical contributions. While he did not cite specific legislation, his remarks underscored broader anxieties about cultural and historical representation.

Mahama warned that such developments in the United States could have consequences beyond its borders. “When major global powers begin to reinterpret or minimize historical truths, the effects are rarely confined domestically,” he suggested, emphasizing the potential for similar trends to emerge in other regions.

The Ghanaian leader framed the issue as one of global importance, particularly for nations with deep historical ties to the African diaspora. He highlighted the need for vigilance in preserving historical narratives that accurately reflect the experiences and contributions of Black communities worldwide.

Mahama’s comments come amid ongoing debates in the United States over how race, history, and identity are taught and represented in public institutions. These discussions have drawn international attention, with leaders and scholars alike weighing in on their broader implications.

Reaffirming Ghana’s position, Mahama called for a collective commitment to safeguarding historical integrity. He stressed that acknowledging the full scope of history is essential not only for education but also for fostering mutual understanding and social cohesion across nations.

Iran has appointed Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr as its new top security official, replacing Ali Larijani, who was killed in a U.S.–Israeli airstrike last week, marking a significant shift in Tehran’s national security leadership amid escalating regional tensions.

The appointment was confirmed on Tuesday, with Zolghadr—a former deputy commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and a prominent hardline figure—assuming the role of secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council.

In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Al Jazeera reported: “Iran has appointed Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, a former IRGC deputy commander and hardline figure, as its new security chief, replacing Ali Larijani, who was killed in a US-Israeli strike last week.”

Larijani, one of Iran’s most influential political figures, was killed on March 17 in what has been described as a targeted strike in Tehran during the ongoing conflict involving the United States and Israel. His death followed a broader campaign of high-level assassinations aimed at Iran’s leadership structure.

Zolghadr brings decades of military and political experience to the role. A brigadier general in the IRGC, he previously served in senior positions within Iran’s interior ministry, judiciary, and the Expediency Discernment Council. His appointment signals continuity in Iran’s hardline security posture at a time of heightened confrontation with Western and regional adversaries.

The Supreme National Security Council, which Zolghadr now leads, plays a central role in shaping Iran’s defense and foreign policy strategy, coordinating between military, intelligence, and political institutions.

Analysts view the leadership change as part of Iran’s effort to rapidly stabilize its command structure following a series of high-profile losses, while maintaining a firm stance in the ongoing conflict.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) says Iran’s capacity to threaten commercial shipping in the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz has been significantly weakened following a series of coordinated U.S. strikes targeting key military infrastructure.

According to a statement shared on social media and reported by Al Jazeera, CENTCOM assessed that Tehran’s ability to strike vessels transiting the narrow waterway has been “degraded,” marking a notable development in the ongoing conflict between the United States and Iran.

CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper confirmed that recent operations included precision strikes on an underground weapons facility along Iran’s coastline. The facility, believed to house missile systems and related equipment, was targeted as part of a broader effort to dismantle Iran’s anti-ship capabilities and secure maritime routes critical to global energy supplies.

Military officials indicate that the strikes form part of a wider campaign aimed at neutralizing Iran’s ability to disrupt international shipping. The Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil supply passes, has long been a focal point of tensions, with Iran previously threatening to mine or block the corridor.

Recent operations have included sustained air and naval assaults on Iranian assets, including missile launch sites, radar systems, and naval vessels. U.S. officials argue that these actions have reduced Iran’s operational reach, particularly in maritime domains, where its forces have historically relied on asymmetric tactics such as fast attack craft and sea mines.

Despite these claims, the broader conflict remains volatile. Iran has continued to demonstrate retaliatory capabilities, including missile launches and threats to regional infrastructure, underscoring that while its capabilities may be diminished, they have not been eliminated.

The latest developments highlight the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz and the risks associated with its disruption, as global markets and regional security remain closely tied to stability in the waterway.

Manchester United have taken a decisive stance in ongoing transfer negotiations with FC Barcelona, insisting the Spanish giants meet their agreed fee for Marcus Rashford rather than extend his stay in Spain on loan.

The development comes as United’s on-field progress continues to strengthen their position. A hard-fought 2–2 draw against AFC Bournemouth has effectively secured Champions League football for next season, marking a significant milestone in the club’s campaign and reinforcing their ambitions heading into a crucial summer.

Rashford’s Resurgence in Barcelona

Rashford has enjoyed an impressive loan spell at Barcelona under Hansi Flick, registering 10 goals and 13 assists despite not being a consistent starter. His productivity has reinforced Barcelona’s desire to retain him, with all parties reportedly aligned on a continued partnership.

However, financial constraints have complicated matters. Barcelona are attempting to avoid triggering the €30 million (£26 million) purchase clause, instead proposing a second loan deal for the 2026/27 season. Under that structure, United would either receive the fee a year later or in staggered payments.

United Reject Delay Tactics

Manchester United have rejected that proposal outright. The club is preparing for a major transfer window and views immediate funds from Rashford’s sale as essential to financing new acquisitions.

The club’s position is clear: Barcelona must activate the agreed clause this summer or Rashford will return to Old Trafford. Internally, there is growing confidence that holding firm will force Barcelona’s hand.

Strategic Timing Amid Strong Finish

United’s refusal to compromise is also shaped by their improved sporting outlook. Securing Champions League qualification—confirmed following the draw with Bournemouth—places the club in a stronger negotiating position both financially and competitively.

The return to Europe’s elite competition not only boosts revenue streams but also enhances United’s appeal to potential signings, making the timing of Rashford’s sale even more critical.

What Comes Next

Barcelona are reportedly exploring alternative options, including interest in Pedro Neto of Chelsea FC, though such a move would likely prove more expensive than securing Rashford permanently.

For now, the situation remains unresolved. Yet with United firm in their demands and buoyed by Champions League qualification, the balance of power appears to be shifting toward Old Trafford as the summer window approaches.